Why is it so hard to sue big companies? And why you can't sue some of the biggest companies in the U.S.
Not until now
Facebook and Twitter have censored you? Users Can Sue Big Tech for Being Silenced Under a New Bill. Everyone reading this essay has either encountered or knows someone who has suffered social media censorship. Millions of people are affected by Facebook and Twitter censorship, whether their perfectly harmless message was "deleted for breaking community rules" or they were abruptly silenced for life. Whatever level of big tech censorship you've experienced, there's one thing they all have in common: you have no redress. One legislator, though, wants to change that.
Following the increase in censorship around the end of 2020, Republican lawmakers prepared legislation that may put huge digital companies like Twitter and Facebook in legal hot water for stifling political discourse. "I drafted it in December, and things have only grown worse," said lead sponsor State Rep. Tom Kading, R-North Dakota. According to the measure, social media platforms would be accountable in civil court for damages to a North Dakota citizen "whose expression is limited, banned, or repressed," as long as the speech is not "obscene, vulgar, lascivious, filthy, overly violent, harassing, or otherwise unpleasant."
Moves are being made
"I'm appalled by what's happening in our country," said State Rep. Tom Kading, R-North Dakota. "Censorship does not foster unity, it does not heal our country's divisions, and it does not de-escalate the situation." "All it does is make those who have been silenced dig in even deeper and be much more suspicious of what is going on." The bill's premise is misleading in that it does not focus on censorship, because corporations would claim — incorrectly — that they have the authority to prohibit anybody they choose. The focus of this law is now on libel.
"If a website selectively posts material or manipulates genuine facts in order to establish a specifically intended narrative," Kading argued, citing case law from state supreme courts, "this restricting behavior can effectively amount to defamation." While this measure may be welcome news to people who have been censored, it is unlikely to pass since big tech's vast legal staff has developed terms of service that are so wide that they shield them from much culpability. These terms must be accepted in order to create an account for these services. This is why, rather than striving to modify these platforms, the solution to big tech censorship is to abandon them totally.
Make Your Point
As said in 2020, if the establishment and big tech wanted to cause less harm and de-escalate the probable civil war in the US, they would have utilized different methods. They should have responded with more transparency if they wanted to allay public fears about the election outcomes. Instead, they silenced anybody who dared to challenge it, dismissing any claims of electoral fraud as "fake news." Make no mistake: those enforcing these Orwellian limitations realize that silence will not prevent the propagation of erroneous ideas or concerns. They justify their actions, encourage paranoia, and radicalize people to the point of erupting.
Take Action
While a private corporation may and should pick its partners, the assumption that Facebook and Twitter are private is incorrect. When you examine deeper, the concept of "private enterprises" starts to fall apart, from government-funded censorship arms to the revolving door of high-level officials who control the oligopolies' ranks. To achieve the establishment's aims, private-sector enterprises do not need to be officially nationalized; just placing its alumni in significant regulatory positions will suffice.
This permits these businesses to create a privatized appearance while actually acting as state representatives and avoiding any constitutional checks. Meanwhile, if censorship benefits them, half of the populace celebrates and defends it, minimizing opposition. This is why, rather than legislation, a boycott is the greatest option. It's time to get off these platforms that follow you, ban you from doing certain things, sell you to the highest bidder, and tear society apart. There are censorship-free platforms that are far more user-friendly and treat you like a customer rather than a sheep driven to slaughter. You may learn more about them by clicking here.
Comments